Bryson DeChambeau's 2020 U.S. Open win may come to be seen as a watershed moment in the history of golf as pertains to equipment.

Special Edition: Taking a stand on reining in golf equipment is a Cool Golf Thing

Recent USGA and R&A announcements on golf equipment regulations augur well for the long-term health of the game.

It has been a big week for golf in the 21st century and beyond.

On Tuesday, the USGA and The R&A announced their intentions to potentially curtail some of the recent advancements in golf equipment that have radically changed the way the game is played, particularly at the highest levels of amateur and professional competition.

The main content of the announcement revolves around “a set of research topics relating to potential Equipment Rule changes,” with a particular eye toward how such changes might “help mitigate the continuing distance increases” that have been observed at the game’s highest levels in recent years.

This is painful but important work; after all, doing the right thing almost never means doing the easy thing. If successful, it will have long-term benefits both for golfers – elite and recreational alike – and the courses they love.

Battle lines are currently being drawn over whether this change requires such action, but it is undeniable that the way the game is played at the highest levels has changed considerably in recent years, favoring an all-out power assault more than ever before.

Off the tee, trading away accuracy in favor of brute force can be lucrative.

Future golfers may regard Bryson DeChambeau’s dominant 2020 U.S. Open win as a watershed moment. DeChambeau smacked tee shots all over the lot at Winged Foot Golf Club’s West Course, averaging more than 325 yards off the tee while finding only 41% of the fairways.

Missing all those fairways was of little consequence to DeChambeau, who was almost always close enough to a green to wedge it on, even from Winged Foot’s fearsome rough.

For centuries, great golf has required its share of power, certainly, but also a large measure of accuracy, which was long considered a superior skill due to its more complex demands than raw strength and flexibility. But DeChambeau proved that off the tee, trading away accuracy in favor of brute force can be lucrative.

As recently as 15 years ago, most drivers were considerably smaller than the 460 cubic-centimeter USGA limit. Once manufacturers learned to design clubheads that large and aerodynamic enough to be swung reliably at high speed, they became ubiquitous. Now, pros can smash drives far enough that accuracy is less important than at any point in golf’s half-millennium history.

It is clear that in the view of the governing bodies, this imbalance will only grow if the current equipment paradigm continues. Young bombers who grew up on 460cc drivers have flooded the upper echelons with bomb-and-gouge golf.

Because their skill sets have been marginalized, shorter-hitting tacticians are being crowded out, which makes Webb Simpson’s recent comments all the more perplexing. He of all players should welcome changes to equipment that will clearly reward his accuracy-forward game; he’s #2 on the PGA Tour in fairways hit so far this season.

Another surprising response: that of Wesley Bryan, whose lone PGA Tour win came at Harbour Town, arguably the PGA Tour course where driving distance matters least, in 2017.

Then there's the golf ball’s role in the recent distance explosion. The introduction of the solid-core Titleist ProV1 in 2001 revolutionized the industry, enabling manufacturers to combine premium feel and performance – distance, reliable flight on full shots and control on and around the greens – in a way that earlier generations simply could not.

In the decades since, Titleist and its competitors have refined their materials and other aspects of design to the point where the best players can generate reliable ball flight even at 300 or more yards downrange.

The fact that the USGA and R&A are willing to take action suggests that they believe addressing the problem is worth the blowback from players and manufacturers. The end result of this process is unknown, but here are some changes that could be coming:

  • Shorter maximum club length. A reduction in maximum driver length from 48 to 46 inches (putters are allowed to be longer) seems the most likely initial change. Bryson DeChambeau’s (and others’) stated intention to further augment his driving distance via a 48-inch driver in the wake of his US Open win is a likely catalyst here, as the comment window regarding this potential change is very short, closing in early March.
  • Tighter spring-like effect testing limits. The USGA/R&A report all but admits that they have given a wider berth for clubface springiness than they needed to. That trampoline effect – measured by characteristic time (CT), the maximum time a ball stays on the clubface at impact before launching off – is currently 239 microseconds plus an 18-microsecond tolerance, for a total limit of 257 microseconds. The memo suggests that new testing methods are strong enough that that tolerance can come down to 6 microseconds, for a new maximum of 245. This can slow down drivers modestly, especially for high-speed players.
  • “Ball efficiency.” There are several paths here, including dimple geometry that slightly destabilizes flight at higher speeds, raises spin, lowers overall ball speed or some combination thereof. There is also language about changing the procedures the USGA uses to test new ball models, possibly using a higher launch angle to mimic the trend toward higher-launch, lower-spin club/shaft/ball combinations.
Go, ball, go.

Coaxing shotmaking back into golf’s elite levels will take the game to new heights of excitement.

If the governing bodies get this right, any new equipment regulations should settle the performance characteristics of equipment at a level that brings the currently skewed dynamic between power and accuracy back into balance.

Interesting times are ahead for equipment companies, who have relied for decades on using famous golfers to market their clubs. A rollback that only affects elite competition will threaten this tried-and-true marketing paradigm. Golfers may remember Callaway's non-conforming ERC II drivers, released in 2001. It caused a stir early on with its super-charged face, but the experiment didn't continue. Golfers seem to instinctively want to play the same equipment the pros play, even if they don't aspire to such heights in the game themselves.

Objections will continue to roll out from the ranks of professional golfers. This is understandable because they invest a considerable amount of time into matching their games to contemporary equipment and are loath to turn the clock back.

I would not put much stock in their complaints, though. After all, they are the most skilled golfers in the world, which means they will be able to adapt so quickly as to render any current pearl-clutching silly in hindsight. If and when they are forced to play a slightly slowed-down ball and driver, they will be just fine. Many will flourish, in fact.

Remember what Tiger Woods did at the 1997 Masters and 2000 U.S. Open? No one has played golf that incredible since then. If anything, the equipment of today makes it less likely we will ever see such a viscerally thrilling combination of power and accuracy. Coaxing shot-making back into golf’s elite levels will take the game to new heights of excitement. Any fan of the professional game should root for it.

Club and golf ball rollback: What about the rest of us?

In the days since the USGA and R&A dropped this bombshell, many rank-and-file golfers have seemed apprehensive that any “rollback” might make the game more difficult or less fun for them if it trickles down from the elite ranks.

These concerns are fully understandable, but they are not well-supported by the facts. While the elite amateur and professional ranks have gotten steadily longer over the course of this century, those gains have not been realized by average golfers in the same way. The R&A’s surveys of average driving distance by recreational golfers suggests that that cohort peaked, at 217 yards, in 2005. The average in 2019: 216 yards.

In those 14 years, the PGA Tour gained 10 yards.

Most golfers would agree that drivers today are better than they were in 2005. But better in what ways, and for whom? Yes, custom fitting has never been more available (or sensible) to avid golfers, and few would argue that current products look and feel better than ever before. I'm in the market for some new clubs myself.

But overwhelmingly, it seems elite golfers – a tiny percentage of the game who are inherently better-equipped to adapt to any club or ball “rollback” – have benefited from technology’s inexorable forward march than average players.

As this debate heats up and inevitably threatens to boil over, it is important to remember two important points:

1. The golfers and companies who come out against this necessary step by the governing bodies are extremely qualified to deal with whatever happens.

2. Because the governing bodies know that technology has disproportionately benefited elite players, any effects “regular” golfers see should be negligible at best.

If the USGA and R&A get this right, golfers 10, 50 and 500 years in the future will be grateful for the ability to measure their own abilities and standards of play against their predecessors in a way that, to this point in the game’s history, the evolution of equipment has made impossible.

Are you for or against an equipment rollback? Let us know in the comments below.

OpinionGearTrendsCool Golf Things
Tim Gavrich is a Senior Writer for GolfPass. Follow him on Twitter @TimGavrich and on Instagram @TimGavrich.
42 Comments
Commented on

Agree

Commented on

USGA wants to keep meddling when unwarranted. Also want to penalize people like DeChambeau who work harder than all else. Don't think longer drives will help him. In Masters he played with Bernhard Langer who beat him. Langer was outdriven (length not accuracy) by huge distances. USGA wants to ignore reality & meddle.
They don't realize when a golfer has an extra long driver with otherwise standard length clubs, the driver requires completely different swing timing for good shots. That difference makes golf MORE difficult unless all clubs in the bag are proportionately long. It makes a golfer's swing timing less stable - no longer a single timing that works under pressure for every club.
I have a back that gets tweeked if I use standard length clubs. I have to bend over farther than most people while my hips are twisted towards the target at impact as they should be. I am 71 years old. I have a long lower body & legs, short upper body. My arms are shorter than average for my height, have flat swing plane. Each factor requires additional club length. All my clubs are long - 2 in over woods, 1-1/2 in over irons - all graphite shafts to keep swingweights limited. Driver is 47 in, 3wood 45 in, 5wood 44 in, etc. Irons 39-1/2 in 5iron, others proportionate. Took a while to get timing right.(and consistent), but no more back problems. I am actually now more consistent with them because I don't need a contorted swing any more. I HIT THE BALL NO FARTHER THAN WITH STANDARD LENGTH CLUBS

Commented on

Yes, I am for a rollback for equipment. I believe that the technology will eventually hurt the game and business. The vast majority of golf enthusiasts will not be able to keep up with the continually lengthening of the courses.

Commented on

I am a 76 year old golfer. As it is my best drives may be only 190 yards with average closer to 175 yards. The equipment changes to curb the distance for top less than 1% golfers seems ridiculous to me. Because they can hit 350 yards you are going to change equipment so I cannot even hope to cross a150 yard penalty area to get to the fairway. May be you are suggesting golfers like us should quit or take up a different game? What about the youngsters who are just starting? You will discourage them before they get interested.

Staff
Commented on

Hi Raj, I would not suggest the USGA and R&A ar eager to pursue any equipment changes that will cause you and fellow senior golfers to suddenly hit the ball 25 yards shorter. That's not what's going on here. These organizations are mostly concerned with the 350-yard hitters you mention. In fact, the aspects of the equipment that have enabled elite golfers to go from 320 to 350 in recent years have only granted you and your peers a tiny fraction of those extra yards, if any.

Commented on

In all the years I've been playing this game, I have yet to come off the course and hear anybody complain that they're hitting it too far.

The manufacturer's of golf equipment are using advancements in science, metallurgy and materials to advance the game. Why would you want to stop this innovation? Players at the elite levels are gym junkies, having trainers, dieticians, psychologists, physiotherapists etc at their beck and call.

I think it would be easier for golf courses to grow the grass & put in hazards between 300-350 yards off the tees, grow the rough deeper, narrow the fairways by 5-10 yards forcing players to bring some level of skill back into the game. Players could still hit drivers off the Par 5's and pick and choose whatever club for the rest of the course.

Commented on

Another attempt to stop the great game of golf from growing. EVERY new generation has improved over the previous, so why is better accuracy, better control and more distance bad. These possible changes will not really make a difference. The longest will still be longer and the manufacturers will figure out a way to speed up the ball or make it spin more, so what, that is where the fun is. Grow the rough, speed up the greens and play the older shorter courses. So what if the pros shoot 20 under, it is just a number. The USGA has a fetish with par. Forget the numbers and let the best player win.

Staff
Commented on

Hi David, just FYI, golf has not experienced significant growth since the very beginning of this century. Any suggestion that the evolution in golf equipment that has happened in the last 15+ years has noticeably grown the game is simply not supported by facts.

Commented on

I have enjoyed the advantages of new technology but a roll-back doesn't solve the problem. It only puts a band-aid on it. Sure, some of the older classic courses would be available, but bigger, stronger athletes will still dominate the game. Those of us who are older and weaker would be penalized. If one is bored by the driver/wedge success of the modern player, perhaps watching the Champions Tour would bring back the old days of precision placement golf. I enjoy with envy watching the "big dog eat". Rolling back the ball or the clubs is just another way for the USGA to control the game that has passed them by. They tried to slow it down with the new groove rule with no success. What is next? Persimmon and guta-percha. Let them play!! The number they shoot is added up over 4 days and the lowest total wins. Who cares if it is under or over par.

Commented on

My concern is some gem courses have become outdated due to driver distance. I think limits need to be set

Commented on

I am in favor of the rollback. Currently it seems that we need to buy a new driver every year to keep up. Only the wealthiest golfers can do that. Not a level playing field

Commented on

Let the equipment evolve. Put in a longer set of tees for that select few that can hit those monster drives. I am 75 years old and my booming drives of yesteryear are no longer (pun) there. When I play my kids I use the closest tee I can find and after the drive it is a game of accuracy and it still is a lot of fun. Drive for show- putt for dough!

Commented on

I agree with the roll back. I will accept the changes to my game and won't change my enjoyment of it.. I always viewed golf as a game of skill. The increased distance has stopped me from watching Professional golf on TV and in person. Driver wedge is not fun to watch. The skill of course management has been removed.

More from the author
1 Min Read
September 17, 2021
R.I.P. to a legend.
3 Min Read
September 16, 2021
Golf course news and notes: September, 2021.
4 Min Read
September 13, 2021
With a radical concept and engaging design, The Match golf course at PGA National Resort & Spa points toward a more creative future for the game in America.
1 Min Read
September 10, 2021
Play early, play often.
11 Min Read
September 9, 2021
Once considered novelties, par-3 courses are increasingly popular among traveling golfers, club members and communities.
3 Min Read
September 7, 2021
Some dismiss "outside operations" as entry-level work, but it can make or break a golf experience.
Popular
4 Min Read
September 10, 2021
Pete Dye's golf course designs set the bar for innovation, creativity and challenge. We've compiled his top courses as rated on Golf Advisor by regular golfers like you.
3 Min Read
August 19, 2021
Two recent sales of golf courses will eventually lead to the development of solar farms, continuing a concerning trend for golfers.
9 Min Read
August 26, 2021
Who should you tip and how much? From caddies to bag boys to locker room attendants, here's how much cash you should bring to the club.
3 Min Read
August 27, 2021
USA and Europe's finest women prepare to face off on a Donald Ross Midwestern classic. Here's a hole-by-hole guide to venerable Inverness.
Load More
Now Reading
Special Edition: Taking a stand on reining in golf equipment is a Cool Golf Thing