South/North at Spanish Wells Country Club

The East course is better but the south fairways were very wet, especially first 3 holes. Greens on the slow side.

the layout if the course is quite interesting . But they need to shut this place down , the fairways are appauling .Most of the holes were like playing in a farmers field . The drainage on the fairways is awful to Non existent.

South course fairways were wet and seem to be always wet. Greens were furry and slow. East course better. Good value as a hot deal at around $75. Staff is terrific, range was ok.

I’ve played all four 9’s in the past, and conditions were previously much better. The North course was the most disappointing. Several tee boxes were chopped up and/or not level. The fairways were thin, and where there was more grass, they cut too low. The greens were ok, but many of the golfers are too lazy to fix their ball marks. I probably repaired an average of 3 or 4 ball marks per hole. The South course was in better condition. Although all SWF courses are now ridiculously over-priced, Spanish Wells is a more reasonably over-priced course.

water on almost every hole. creates intrigue and interest. layout is fair.

Played 18 paired with another friendly and fun couple. We played the combo blue/white and white/red. Previous time we did white only and green only. Course is definitely more challenging for longer play, as in more water hazards in front of tee box. South course was a bit soggy due to recents rain but still was ok play.

way overpriced for what it is, greens were ok but the rest of the course was mediocre at best

Played East and North Nines. Course and greens were in good shape despite recent rains. North 9 was more challenging due to water hazards.Pace of play just over 4 hrs. Staff very friendly and helpful.Enjoyed round and will return.

Just think it’s too expensive for this particular course. If they are gonna charge this much the course conditions should be substantially better. IMHO.