Knollwood Golf Course
Rating Snapshot
About
| Tee | Par | Length | Rating | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back | 72 | 6373 yards | 70.1 | 123 |
| Back (W) | 73 | 6373 yards | 77.1 | 133 |
| Middle | 72 | 5963 yards | 68.1 | 118 |
| Middle (W) | 73 | 5963 yards | 73.5 | 129 |
| Forward (W) | 73 | 5714 yards | 73.1 | 126 |
| Hole | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Out | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | In | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue M: 70.8/124 | 430 | 535 | 339 | 587 | 383 | 173 | 383 | 164 | 371 | 3365 | 361 | 474 | 338 | 156 | 302 | 391 | 504 | 125 | 369 | 3020 | 6385 |
| White M: 69.1/119 W: 75.3/129 | 414 | 494 | 314 | 557 | 360 | 157 | 364 | 143 | 345 | 3148 | 357 | 454 | 301 | 148 | 293 | 378 | 482 | 116 | 348 | 2877 | 6025 |
| Red W: 73.5/127 | 405 | 472 | 288 | 512 | 343 | 127 | 341 | 135 | 325 | 2948 | 335 | 429 | 270 | 143 | 284 | 372 | 463 | 91 | 335 | 2722 | 5670 |
| Handicap | 1 | 5 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 15 | 9 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 18 | 10 | |||
| Par | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 72 |
| Handicap (W) | 9 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 16 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 10 |
Course Details
Rentals/Services
Practice/Instruction
Policies
Food & Beverage
Food & BeverageReviews
Reviewer Photos
-
Photo submitted by Andre1879710 on 05/11/2022
-
Last hole Photo submitted by u000005009430 on 09/11/2020
-
whazzup Photo submitted by whazzup on 03/12/2015
-
2013 Glendale City Golf Champion (Brand Flight) Photo submitted by 818Golfer on 08/20/2013
-
#1 Knollwood Golf Club Photo submitted by kidcody on 11/30/2012
Greens good. Rest of course terrible.
Range balls are $14 for 70 balls!!! And they’re the extra soft-extra limited flight ones. That price is unconscionable. On terrible mats.
Then, it LOOKED like the course is GREEN - but if you looked carefully, the fringe around the practice putting green is PAINTED GREEN. Then when you look down the first fairway, it LOOKS nice - but once you get out there - it’s actually PAINTED. It barely has any grass. Then you get to the 2nd Hole - and you see how torn up, dry, patchy and horrible the rest of the fairways are.
They’re maintaining greens - like all these LA country courses - but why aren’t they watering the fairways and maintaining them??? It’s absolutely trashed, ripped to shreds, patches of dirt everywhere.
Tee boxes are all mostly not flat, they’re all lumpy and full of humps. Terrible.
It took 3 hours to play the front 9, and 2.5 hours to play the back.
Until some reviews tell us that the course is lush again, I will not play here. It’s the worst I’ve seen it. Doesn’t matter if the greens seem ok, it’s only like that because it’s winter and the cold weather helps to keep them firm.
Is this where public golf is? Is this what the golf industry claims it supports and promotes? It’s depressing. The game is becoming elitist and they’re ok with it. It’s a game for the rich, because the rich can afford to pay for the nice conditions and the rest of the people are being treated poorly, like this, and they don’t care. The days of “Play Golf America” when it needed people to play the game, is over, they no longer care what happens at the low income levels.
Seems decent for a municipal golf course but got pretty backed up from around the 7th hole on.
Not worth it
Randomly saw this course on Golfnow, not worth it. Pace of play was terrible. Front 9 almost took my 3 some 3.5 hours. Course conditions are not good. Lay out is alright. Just not worth the money
Course conditions
The controllable maintenance items such as mowing heights and frequency, bunker edging and trim work was good. Greens could be 1-2 foot faster but overall good aside from the irregular winter dormancy conditions of the various turf varieties
