Stonemont at Stone Mountain Golf Course
About
Stone Mountain Golf Club sits at the base of one of the Southeast's most popular attractions, Stone Mountain. The club offers two 18-hole courses, Lakemont and Stonemont. The Stonemont Course is the club's original layout, designed by Robert Trent Jones. The gentle hills surrounding the mountain provide the golf course with rolling fairways and greens. The contours are subtle, but they can be deceiving. The classic but tricky layout requires careful strategy and course management in addition to accuracy. The course is routed around the mountain and its accompanying lake, weaving through dense forests of Georgia pine. The layout features narrow fairways, but one of the most challenging features are the numerous bunkers strategically placed throughout. Since opening in 1969, Stone Mountain's Stonemont Course has hosted numerous events, both local and national.
| Tee | Par | Length | Rating | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 6863 yards | 73.7 | 132 |
| Blue | 70 | 6479 yards | 72.0 | 128 |
| White | 70 | 6129 yards | 70.4 | 124 |
| White (W) | 71 | 6129 yards | 76.3 | 136 |
| White/Red Combo | 70 | 5580 yards | 73.9 | 132 |
| Red (W) | 71 | 5460 yards | 73.5 | 130 |
| Hole | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Out | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | In | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black M: 73.3/131 | 451 | 289 | 533 | 435 | 441 | 230 | 447 | 200 | 439 | 3465 | 202 | 418 | 388 | 417 | 423 | 407 | 188 | 430 | 525 | 3398 | 6863 |
| Blue M: 70.3/126 | 435 | 279 | 491 | 415 | 395 | 210 | 415 | 170 | 404 | 3214 | 185 | 400 | 368 | 400 | 409 | 395 | 180 | 415 | 513 | 3265 | 6479 |
| White M: 69.2/123 W: 73.1/127 | 423 | 269 | 465 | 391 | 370 | 194 | 392 | 143 | 370 | 3017 | 169 | 382 | 350 | 387 | 390 | 378 | 169 | 400 | 487 | 3112 | 6129 |
| Yellow M: 66.1/114 W: 70.1/118 | 254 | 269 | 463 | 361 | 357 | 157 | 392 | 130 | 356 | 2739 | 155 | 360 | 330 | 350 | 361 | 340 | 145 | 370 | 460 | 2871 | 5610 |
| Red M: 58.4/94 W: 60.9/102 | 254 | 257 | 449 | 300 | 320 | 120 | 390 | 130 | 356 | 2576 | 145 | 365 | 330 | 310 | 361 | 325 | 144 | 290 | 448 | 2718 | 5294 |
| Handicap | 1 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 15 | 7 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 12 | |||
| Par | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 35 | 70 |
| Handicap (W) | 9 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 4 |
Course Details
Rentals/Services
Practice/Instruction
Policies
Available Facilities
Clubhouse, Banquet FacilitiesReviews
Reviewer Photos
-
Photo submitted by julitopen on 11/13/2024
-
Photo submitted by julitopen on 11/13/2024
-
Photo submitted by chepowell on 04/21/2024
-
Photo submitted by Pkong01 on 12/15/2023
-
Photo submitted by Pkong01 on 12/15/2023
-
Photo submitted by Pkong01 on 12/15/2023
-
Photo submitted by Pkong01 on 12/15/2023
-
Photo submitted by u314163734738 on 05/21/2023
-
Photo submitted by JohnyJ on 05/01/2023
-
Greens Photo submitted by Peter3943030 on 11/30/2022
-
17th green and Stone Mt Photo submitted by Peter3943030 on 11/30/2022
-
Practice green Photo submitted by Peter3943030 on 11/30/2022
-
Photo submitted by Brian7454123 on 10/15/2022
-
Photo submitted by Brian7454123 on 10/15/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Fargorito on 05/06/2022
-
Photo submitted by Doug518 on 03/15/2020
-
Photo submitted by juanvic on 08/06/2019
-
Photo submitted by manderson831 on 10/02/2017
-
Photo submitted by manderson831 on 10/02/2017
-
Photo submitted by manderson831 on 10/02/2017
-
Photo submitted by u000006723675 on 04/24/2017
-
Photo submitted by u000006723675 on 04/24/2017
-
Photo submitted by u000006723675 on 04/24/2017
-
Photo submitted by u000006723675 on 04/24/2017
-
Photo submitted by u000006723675 on 04/24/2017
-
Photo submitted by Mbischof on 03/26/2013
-
Photo submitted by russell9274400 on 12/24/2012
Slow play and they didn't pair up singles or twosomes
Otherwise, good greens, fairways, tee boxes
Not Great, Not Good
For a course that is not cheap, this place is a gimmick. We had a 1150 tee time, get there at 1120, go into the pro shop, check in, buy range balls, the usual progression.
We get to the range, which is about a 3-4 minute drive from the pro shop, and the ball dispenser is empty, so no range balls for us, amazing they didn’t have this ready for Sunday morning tee times.
Then we go to the starter and one tee at 1140 to check in, there’s a twosome on the tee box, and apparently another two some ahead of us, which seemed off because we’re 1150, it’s 1140 and their tee times are on the ten minute.
The starter then explained to us that they were both the 1140 tee time, but since they booked separately they were going to have them play separate, so our 1150 tee time quickly became noon, with two twosomes in front of us that were behind like 19 foursomes I believe the starter said.
So with our newly found free time since there were none of our paid for range balls to hit or scheduled tee times to play, we talked to the starter about the course.
They’d lost sections of the greens to fungus so there’s huge sand sections sporadically throughout the course, so that’s just brutal. Type of grass on the greens varies from one hole to the next so some were punched more recently that others. It was just a mess.
Overall, the place is a disaster. When we made the turn, we saw 12 guys standing on one tee box who looked prepared to play together as one big group, and we got to ten tee to learn one of the twosomes was now a single so we got to watch a single play golf the whole back nine with absolutely nowhere to go due to the terrible pace of play management.
Average course
Average course as far as conditions and pace of play go. We teed off at 9:30 and finished at almost 2 pm. Some of the greens were in rough shape and were just dirt and sand, but most were in fair to good shape. Different layout and a lot of great scenic views.
Would recommend but after greens improve
Staff there is always top notch and very helpful. My recommendation is more a policy issue. There was an aerification warning on the hot deal sign up. I hit the pause button and called the pro shop to inquire about it. They said that they picked the greens a couple weeks ago and that is should be healed up. It was anything but. Greens were in terrible shape as if they had lost them and tried to punch them to work through it. Policy change should really be that there should be some sort of rating system or better communication when they are that bad. Please address. Again staff otherwise was super and the layout is top notch.
Course in great shape. No back ups but took close to 5 hours.
Good and bad
It was a little longer course than me and my dad usually play. We were pretty consistently 20-30 yards short of the green after two shots. We played from the white tees. That’s fine, we just aren’t very good haha!
Fairways and tee boxes were in great condition. Easy to hit off of, and even the higher stuff wasn’t bad at all.
Bad: greens. Greens were bumpy and sandy. Impossible to read and impossible to putt well on. Very disappointing.
Also, they don’t tell you that you have to pay $20 to park. I thought we were getting a great deal but ended up paying as much or more as we would’ve on other courses.
Also, when we google Stone Mountain golf course, all the pictures were or Lakemont and we couldn’t play Lakemont. I honestly had no clue there were two courses.
Would’ve been nice to have been told the greens have been recently aerated and sanded prior to getting to the course. They are still several weeks away from being even remotely playable
Booking info
Great course from tee to green..however greens had just been aerated..had we know this we would not have booked here..
Greens just Aerated
Beautiful course, sandy greens now, though. Everything else was awesome
Very nice course. Very difficult. My son and I were paired up with another twosome. We had a great round.
Very poor condition, not worth the $$
Course condition was very poor. Sand on greens, bunkers untouched for months, fairways not kept up etc. To pay $80 on the weekend is at least twice as much as it’s worth.
Expensive for what you get
This course overall is a good course. Definitely expensive for what you get, especially when you add the $20 fee to even come in the park. The golf course needs to figure this part out because it is ridiculous to expect golfers to pay on top of what they are already paying. Terrible marketing to new players. Other than that terrible aspect the fairways are in good shape. Greens are decent with a few missed ball marks. They need to tend to weeds on the green and definitely the bunkers. One was filled with water and for that price is unacceptable. Overall the course is a 7/10 but for the price it is a 5/10