CrossCreek Golf Club

About
Situated amidst the beauty of the Temecula Valley, CrossCreek Golf Club enjoys a peacefully secluded setting enclosed by groves of mature oak and sycamore trees. Arthur Hills designed the course, using the rolling hills to incorporate tricky blind shots to elevated greens. His design is a true test of target golf. There is plenty of variety throughout the golf course with some holes that are framed by towering treetops and other holes that are wide-open, subjecting them to the prevailing winds. You won't find too many greenside bunkers but there are many fairways bunkers. Be prepared to use every club in your bag on this golf course. One of CrossCreek Golf Club's most memorable holes is the par-3 17th, which is carved into a rocky hillside. The green is similar to that of the notorious 12th hole at Augusta National, featuring a bushy creek protecting the front.
Tee | Par | Length | Rating | Slope |
---|---|---|---|---|
Black | 71 | 6780 yards | 73.5 | 140 |
Players | 71 | 6426 yards | 71.8 | 135 |
Blue | 71 | 6290 yards | 71.2 | 132 |
White | 71 | 5762 yards | 68.6 | 123 |
Gold | 71 | 5264 yards | 66.6 | 116 |
Gold (W) | 71 | 5264 yards | 72.6 | 136 |
Green/Gold | 71 | 4694 yards | 64.0 | 109 |
Green/Gold (W) | 71 | 4694 yards | 69.4 | 129 |
Green | 71 | 4483 yards | 62.6 | 104 |
Green (W) | 71 | 4483 yards | 67.7 | 121 |
Hole | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Out | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | In | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black M: 73.8/139 W: 80.8/149 | 406 | 408 | 192 | 331 | 502 | 420 | 537 | 219 | 451 | 3466 | 380 | 417 | 183 | 409 | 501 | 422 | 397 | 168 | 437 | 3314 | 6780 |
Players M: 72.2/134 W: 78.9/145 | 370 | 365 | 171 | 331 | 502 | 390 | 537 | 201 | 422 | 3289 | 336 | 387 | 156 | 409 | 501 | 398 | 365 | 168 | 417 | 3137 | 6426 |
Blue M: 71.6/132 W: 78.2/143 | 370 | 365 | 171 | 331 | 484 | 390 | 500 | 201 | 422 | 3234 | 336 | 387 | 156 | 384 | 476 | 398 | 365 | 137 | 417 | 3056 | 6290 |
White M: 69.1/125 W: 75.3/137 | 328 | 308 | 145 | 301 | 464 | 360 | 490 | 179 | 395 | 2970 | 297 | 369 | 133 | 356 | 450 | 364 | 330 | 113 | 380 | 2792 | 5762 |
Gold M: 66.7/118 W: 72.4/130 | 289 | 273 | 137 | 261 | 403 | 335 | 470 | 156 | 364 | 2688 | 253 | 341 | 118 | 303 | 425 | 364 | 330 | 90 | 352 | 2576 | 5264 |
Gold/Green M: 64.1/111 W: 69.2/123 | 289 | 243 | 137 | 261 | 361 | 258 | 410 | 135 | 306 | 2400 | 253 | 295 | 87 | 303 | 400 | 302 | 306 | 90 | 300 | 2336 | 4736 |
Green M: 63.1/108 W: 68.0/120 | 250 | 243 | 81 | 240 | 361 | 258 | 410 | 135 | 306 | 2284 | 209 | 295 | 87 | 230 | 400 | 302 | 306 | 70 | 300 | 2199 | 4483 |
Handicap | 7 | 5 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 2 | |||
Par | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 71 |
Course Details
Rentals/Services
Practice/Instruction
Policies
Food & Beverage
SnacksAvailable Facilities
Banquet FacilitiesReviews
Reviewer Photos
-
Photo submitted by Mick0514 on 06/11/2025
-
Photo submitted by brad1806055 on 06/07/2025
-
Photo submitted by brad1806055 on 06/07/2025
-
Photo submitted by brad1806055 on 06/07/2025
-
Photo submitted by m2kearl on 12/21/2023
-
Photo submitted by creativefletch on 10/13/2023
-
Photo submitted by U000003851417 on 08/16/2023
-
Photo submitted by sandme on 07/16/2023
-
Photo submitted by sandme on 07/16/2023
-
Photo submitted by sandme on 07/16/2023
-
Photo submitted by sandme on 07/16/2023
-
Photo submitted by derekvillarr on 06/24/2023
-
Photo submitted by sjcedillo on 06/17/2023
-
Coyotes Photo submitted by Rexrevard on 02/26/2023
-
Photo submitted by Rexrevard on 02/26/2023
-
Photo submitted by code433 on 02/06/2023
-
Photo submitted by gaarroliga on 10/09/2022
-
Photo submitted by gaarroliga on 10/09/2022
-
Photo submitted by gaarroliga on 10/09/2022
-
Photo submitted by u000006664629 on 07/29/2022
-
Photo submitted by u000006664629 on 07/26/2022
-
Photo submitted by u314162745666 on 05/16/2022
-
Photo submitted by terryim7568 on 01/19/2022
-
Photo submitted by terryim7568 on 01/19/2022
-
Photo submitted by U000003851417 on 10/18/2021
-
Photo submitted by Joe9244021 on 09/12/2021
-
Photo submitted by Logan5691443 on 06/22/2021
-
Two old friends loving Cross Creek today! Photo submitted by u061043518 on 06/21/2021
-
My new flag cool huh Photo submitted by Deadpool22 on 05/09/2021
-
GHOST TREE just so happens to be my nickname. Photo submitted by Deadpool22 on 05/09/2021
-
Photo submitted by Vanbourgois on 05/21/2019
-
Photo submitted by brovarnm on 02/06/2017
-
Photo submitted by brovarnm on 02/06/2017
-
Photo submitted by rtoomb1 on 03/27/2014
-
Photo submitted by rtoomb1 on 03/27/2014
-
Photo submitted by rtoomb1 on 03/27/2014
-
Hole #1 Photo submitted by joeskiluv31 on 12/30/2012
Challenging course
Expect to shoot a higher score (10 shots or more) here than say Redhawk or Rancho Cal. This is due to the quick and difficult hard pan greens and the potential trouble with penalty shots for lost balls. I enjoy the front nine layout much better than the back which gets gimmicky with its more target golf layout. There’s definitely beauty here with its location. Great course to play a scramble. Fairways were hit or miss. Some needed TLC. No cell service.
Just ok
Price online for twosome was $120 + total, paid $140+ at the course, not a big deal. Tee boxes were were set up narrow and very uneven lies. Fairways were just okay, sort of patchy. Greens were good. The pace of play was not so good, waited at least 5-10 minutes on most holes with a twosome in front of us, twosome as well. The one guy was teaching the other guy and took forever on most holes. Never saw a Marshall to speed any group up a bit, not like we were in a hurry but waiting to get going was not happening with any consistency.
Made the best of a bad weather experience
Very nice layout, extremely challenging, would play again with better weather
CrossCreek Beautiful Challenge
Fantastic course for the price. Greens are fast, fairways are cared for, and the scenery is beautiful. I played horribly but that’s not CrossCreeks fault. It is challenging if you’re a beginner. Pro shop and bar are nice. I like their logo on golf shirts/sweaters and the equipment in the shop is top tier. The range looks to be grass and not mats but I’m not really sure I didn’t utilize the range. I will be back soon to try this challenge again on this beautiful golf course.
Always fun
Great course layout, great shape, great staff and always fun
Course in good shape. A few tee bixes very sandy. Greens were rollin. Fairways decent and bunkers had good sanf and consitent as i was in like 6 of them. Started 7:10 am and finished 11:40.
Always love the course
Since JC golf took over management this course has vastly improved. The greens were great and the pace of play was also good. The new club house looks fantastic, unfortunately we weren’t able to eat at the grill as the power was out from the winds. We look forward to being there again.
Super slow
Almost 5 hour round. This course is too tough for average golfers. With no marshalling, no wonder it was almost a 5 hour round.
Cross Creek Golf Course using Golf Now App
The course was fantastic...played January 16th 2025. Cold in the morning but really nice when the sun came up. 5 star rating on course/staff/amenities, etc., etc. I used the Golf Now app and it absolutely sucked. I made a reservation for January 16th on January 14th and the confirmation I received showed the reservation for the 15th!! I did it a second time and same result for f' sake. Called Golf Now support (East Indian call center) and was told I couldn't cancel because the tee time was less than 24 hours out. IT WAS THEIR MISTAKE THAT THE TEE TIME WAS MADE FOR THE 15TH, NOT THE 16TH!!. The rep couldn't help, still got charged the processing fee for each tee time and had to contact the course to cancel the time for the 15th and get one for the 16th. Don't bother using Golf Now App.....Cross Creek again was fantastic.
Groups of 5 , kids under 10 playing on the course as their parents played and martial was useless, other than that it was a good track but should not have taken 5.5 hours at all