Rancho San Joaquin Golf Course
About
| Tee | Par | Length | Rating | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back | 72 | 6431 yards | 70.5 | 126 |
| Back (W) | 72 | 6431 yards | 76.8 | 131 |
| Middle | 72 | 6158 yards | 69.4 | 123 |
| Middle (W) | 72 | 6158 yards | 75.2 | 129 |
| Forward | 72 | 5709 yards | 66.5 | 116 |
| Forward (W) | 72 | 5709 yards | 73.0 | 127 |
| Hole | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Out | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | In | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold M: 70.8/127 W: 76.8/134 | 515 | 150 | 336 | 353 | 520 | 378 | 357 | 176 | 431 | 3216 | 360 | 388 | 535 | 180 | 368 | 168 | 405 | 300 | 469 | 3173 | 6389 |
| Blue M: 69.7/124 W: 75.5/131 | 505 | 142 | 325 | 336 | 507 | 364 | 345 | 166 | 414 | 3104 | 355 | 368 | 525 | 160 | 345 | 158 | 390 | 292 | 457 | 3050 | 6154 |
| White M: 67.2/117 W: 72.5/125 | 495 | 128 | 311 | 315 | 425 | 285 | 322 | 151 | 364 | 2796 | 350 | 330 | 447 | 113 | 330 | 148 | 378 | 285 | 447 | 2828 | 5624 |
| Handicap | 5 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 18 | 16 | |||
| Par | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 36 | 72 |
| Handicap (W) | 3 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 16 | 6 |
Course Details
Rentals/Services
Practice/Instruction
Policies
Food & Beverage
SnacksAccolades
-
Golf Advisor: Top 25 Most Improved U.S. Golf Courses (2022 #21)
Reviews
Reviewer Photos
Former greens keeper point of view
First of all having golf carts on a restrictive, GPS program, makes it impossible for a senior golfer to be able to load and unload his clubs in the parking lot, which is a great convenience which did not exist at this course. The tee boxes were not in good conditions. Divots were not filled tees were not picked up, and the two boxes were not level as a few holes. The fairways were in awful condition. It looked like they hadn’t been watered in two years. The sand traps did not have enough Sand and were eroding from Weather. I did see a few gopher holes not as bad as Willowick though. The good things were the practice facility was State of the Art and the greens were in tiptop shape. They serve charge $72 to play. This course was probably only worth 25.
Bunkers need some love
need some fresh sand - other than that - a wonderful round.
Improved
This track has came along way in the last couple years. Tee box’s, fairways and greens are pure. Clubhouse had a complete make over, great job.
Not worth the money
The conditions here are still really rough. Patchy fairways and rough, inconsistent greens, bone dry in areas and soaking wet in others. Drive 15 minutes to Costa Mesa for 2 courses in much better condition for half the price.
Greens are great
Greens are in very good if not great shape. Nice undulations, interesting.
California can be dry so there are dry spots in the fairways but not too bad.
Pace was great on a very busy day.
Staff was notably kind and helpful. Starters both inside and out great.
Little more water on the fairways could go a long way.
Water in June!
The course could be awesome. Yo feel like you've a great shot off the tee and its plugged because of standing water. There are too many areas that have standing water. The sand in the bunkers or lack of sand in most cases was horrible, according to my buddies. One bunker was full of water! I wish that I had taken pictures.
Recently moved to OC area and trying to play courses out here....
RSJ is a pretty good course and better than most in pricing for the weekend. Course itself needs more work along the fairways, too dry, patches of dirt and not getting rewarded for not hitting the fairways...rough is good and thick, putting greens does not give you true roll, too thick and or spongey...overall was a good round, cart lady making her rounds often is a plus and food on the turn was good too